Best v0 by Vercel Alternatives in 2026

These are the v0 by Vercel alternatives worth your time in 2026, and Lovable wins overall while Bolt.new has the best free plan. If you are on a v0 seat-based team plan and your credits keep expiring unused, Lovable will usually cost you less and give you more of the same full-stack output. Stay on v0 if you deploy to Vercel every day and care about Next.js and shadcn/ui output quality - nothing here beats it on that.

I checked every pricing page below on 14 October 2026. All figures are US dollars on monthly billing unless I say otherwise.

v0 by Vercel alternatives at a glance

Alternative	Best for	Free plan	Starting price	Main advantage	Main limitation
Lovable	Full-stack apps, unlimited team members	Yes	$25/mo (Pro)	No per-seat pricing, two-way GitHub sync	Cannot import an existing repo
Bolt.new	Free and fast browser builds	Yes	$0 with 300K tokens/day	Most generous free allowance in the category	Bolt branding and hosting cap on free tier
Replit Agent	Teams wanting a full IDE and hosting	Yes	$20/mo (Core)	Editor, runtime, database and Agent in one place	Free tier locked to Lite build
Magic Patterns	Design-system-aware prototyping	Yes	$20/seat/mo (Starter)	Built around your real design tokens	No full-stack backend
Claude Code	Developers who want a terminal agent	No	$17/mo (Claude Pro, annual)	Works on real repositories	No visual canvas or preview deploys
GitHub Copilot	Enterprise compliance and IDE estates	Yes	$15/mo (Pro)	Native to GitHub and every major IDE	Builds components, not applications
Cursor	AI-native code editor	Yes	$0 (Free), $8/mo (Plus)	Strong privacy defaults and attestations	SpaceX ownership and OpenAI model loss
Base44	Non-technical internal tools	Yes	$16/mo (Starter, annual)	Real auth, database and hosting on free	Git sync cannot be undone
Hostinger AI Builder	Cheapest hosted build	No	$2.99/mo on 48-month prepay	Hosting bundled at the lowest price	Long prepay, steep renewal
Onlook	Open source and self-hosting	Yes	Free (Apache 2.0)	Code is the source of truth	Next.js and Tailwind focus

Why look for a v0 by Vercel alternative?

The honest answer is that v0 is still one of the better tools here, and most of the switching reasons are about money and lock-in rather than output quality.

Start with cost predictability. v0’s own pricing documentation shows five tiers: Free, Premium at $20 a month and being sunset for new users, Plus at $30 per user per month, Business at $100 per user per month, and Enterprise on custom terms. Credits behave like a prepaid balance. Unused monthly credits roll over but then expire after 65 days, purchased credits last a year but need an active paid plan to use, and generation simply pauses when the balance hits zero. A team that overestimates its usage one month and underestimates the next can quietly lose paid credits. That is a different risk profile from a flat subscription.

Then there is per-seat pricing. Ten engineers on Plus is $300 a month before anyone has generated a single message. Lovable charges for a workspace credit pool and lets you invite unlimited members at no extra cost, which is a structurally different bargain for any team of three or more.

Free allowances are thinner than the competition. v0’s Free plan is capped at seven messages a day and gives new signups a one-time $5 credit, while existing free users keep a $5 monthly allowance. Bolt.new gives 300,000 tokens daily and one million monthly for nothing, permanently.

Finally, v0 is tightly coupled to Vercel. That is a feature if you deploy to Vercel and a constraint if you do not. Enterprise features are also gated high: v0’s team documentation lists role-based access with differentiated Builder, Creator and Viewer roles as an Enterprise-only capability, and notes that a team on Plus also needs a Vercel Pro subscription, an additional $20 a month that adds no v0 capability.

A flat subscription tells you what you will pay. A credit balance tells you what you might pay. Most people who leave v0 are not unhappy with the output - they are unhappy with the invoice.

How I chose these alternatives

The comparison draws on vendor pricing pages and documentation, with established tech press providing market context. Unpublished or conflicting details are identified where they affect the comparison.

I scored each candidate on output quality against real code rather than mocks, ease of reaching a working result, price and free-tier value, integrations and export paths, collaboration and permissioning, privacy and security posture, and how painful it is to move an existing project across. A tool with no way to get your code out scores badly on migration no matter how good its output looks.

Pricing was checked against vendor pages and documentation on 14 October 2026. Firebase Studio was excluded because Google’s documentation says it is winding down and has closed new signups. Google Stitch was excluded because its pricing and paid-plan terms could not be confirmed. Our AI tools directory covers more options.

1. Lovable - Best overall

Lovable is the strongest general replacement for v0 because it matches the full-stack output, does not charge per seat, and keeps your code in a GitHub repository you control.

It works the same way v0 does. You describe an app, it writes the frontend, the backend and the database layer, and it publishes to a live URL. In practice the two produce comparable results for landing pages, dashboards, internal tools and small SaaS products, which is why the choice comes down to commercial terms rather than capability.

The commercial terms are where Lovable wins clearly. Its Free plan gives a daily grant of 5 build credits capped at 30 a month, plus monthly Cloud and AI grants. Pro is $25 a month with 100 monthly credits, and Business is $50. Critically, Lovable’s pricing page states that workspaces support unlimited members on every plan and are priced by the credits they include rather than by seats. On a ten-person team that is the whole argument: v0 charges $300 a month for Plus seats, Lovable charges $25 for the same ten people working from one credit pool.

Enterprise governance is also genuinely stronger. Lovable supports SAML and OIDC through providers including Okta, Azure AD and Google, offers SCIM provisioning, and hosts data in the EU, US or Asia Pacific at your choosing. Business and Enterprise data is never used to train models, where v0 reserves training opt-out for Enterprise customers or teams that have changed the setting in Vercel.

The catch is migration, and it is a real one. Lovable’s Git sync documentation lists importing existing repositories as an unsupported operation: you can only export from Lovable to GitHub. If you already have a live v0 project in a repository, the path is to connect it to GitHub in v0 first, then reconnect from Lovable. Credit accounting is also more complex than v0’s, with separate grants for building, chat, Cloud usage, AI gateway and connectors, each with its own refresh schedule and expiry.

Verdict: switch if team seat cost is your main complaint. Stay on v0 if you are one person, or if you need to open an existing repository inside the builder.

2. Bolt.new - Best free

Bolt.new has the best free plan in this category by a wide margin, and it is a permanent free tier rather than a trial.

The numbers are not close. Bolt’s free plan includes a 300,000-token daily limit and 1 million tokens a month, with public and private projects, unlimited databases and website hosting included. For comparison, v0’s free plan stops at seven messages a day. Bolt’s pricing page also shows that Pro at $25 a month removes the daily token cap entirely, starting at 10 million tokens a month, and that unused tokens roll into the next month.

What you give up on free is branding and hosting headroom. Free sites carry Bolt branding, and v0’s own comparison notes free hosting includes a hard cap of 10 GB of bandwidth and 333,333 requests per month, after which sites stop serving traffic until usage resets. You also get community support only; email support starts on a paid plan. Unused Pro tokens rolling over is a genuine advantage over v0’s 65-day expiry, though Bolt’s annual billing discount of up to 28 percent is the better deal if you commit.

There is also a workflow difference worth knowing. Bolt creates and switches branches and commits automatically, but merges happen in GitHub rather than inside the editor. v0 creates a working branch per chat, opens a pull request and merges it from inside the app, which is tighter for teams that live in pull requests.

Verdict: bolt.new is the right first stop if you are learning, prototyping, or building something you might throw away. For a long-lived product, the branding removal and hosting caps on paid plans are what you are paying the $25 for.

3. Replit Agent - Best for teams

Replit Agent is the best v0 alternative for teams that want a real development environment rather than a chat canvas, and its free Starter plan is permanent.

The difference in shape is the point. Replit gives you a browser IDE, a cloud runtime, a database, object storage, authentication and publishing in one workspace, with Agent as a layer on top. v0 gives you a chat window that writes code for you. Both ship applications; only one lets you open the files afterwards in something that resembles an editor.

Pricing is unusually legible for this category. Replit’s pricing page shows Core at $20 a month, or $18 billed annually, with up to 30 hours of chat on Free Mode, up to 60 projects, and $20 of credit toward more powerful models. Pro is $100 a month, or $90 annually, adding ten parallel agents, premium support, up to 15 collaborators, database rollback to 28 days and $100 in credits. Annual billing saves up to 10 percent.

The free tier is real but narrow, and it is worth reading the details before planning around it. Replit’s Starter plan documentation sets out that Starter users get daily Agent credits up to a monthly cap, Lite build rather than full build, and one free published app that goes offline after 30 days and carries a “Made with Replit” badge. Full build, third-party connectors, AI integrations, Plan mode and badge removal all require Core.

Two Agent features stand out against v0’s offering. Plan mode produces an ordered task list you approve before any code changes, which prevents the expensive wrong turn. And Agent tests its own work in a browser loop and creates checkpoints you can roll back to.

Verdict: choose Replit when the project outlives the prompt and your team wants to open the codebase. Choose v0 when the output is a Next.js app you will ship to Vercel immediately.

4. Magic Patterns - Best specialised option

Magic Patterns is the right choice when the deliverable is screens and flows built on your design system, not a working application with a backend.

It overlaps with v0’s Design Mode rather than with v0’s full-stack agent. You describe a screen, it generates high-fidelity UI grounded in your actual design tokens, you iterate visually, and engineers pick it up through GitHub or an MCP server. If you need auth, a database and hosting, this is the wrong tool.

Pricing is per seat and starts higher than v0’s team tiers. Magic Patterns’ pricing page lists Free at $0 with limited monthly credits, Starter at $20 per seat per month, and Business at $100 per seat per month, with 15 percent off annually. Starter includes 1,000 monthly credits, watermark-free previews, GitHub sync, an MCP server and 10-user workspaces. On-demand usage is $0.02 per extra credit. Business adds SSO, usage reporting and larger workspaces. Enterprise adds custom credit pools, custom design-system import, SCIM and access controls. They are SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified.

The trade-off is structural. There is no backend, no authentication and no application hosting, so you are buying a better design surface rather than a cheaper app builder. Per-seat pricing also means Magic Patterns gets expensive faster than Lovable for larger groups.

Verdict: use Magic Patterns when design fidelity and design-system consistency are the bottleneck. Pair it with v0 rather than replacing it if you still need to ship the app.

5. Claude Code - Best for power users

Claude Code is the best v0 alternative for developers who want an agent working on real code, and it is not an app builder at all.

The workflow is different in kind. You point it at a repository and it reads, edits, runs and tests code. There is no visual canvas, no design mode and no one-click preview deployment. What you gain is that nothing is abstracted away, which matters when you are working on an existing codebase rather than generating a new one.

It comes bundled rather than sold separately. Anthropic’s pricing page lists Claude Pro at $17 a month with annual subscription or $20 billed monthly, and Claude Max from $100 a month with a 5x or 20x usage multiplier. Claude Code is included on Pro and Max, and Anthropic’s support documentation confirms the same subscription covers Claude Code in the terminal and in IDEs including VS Code, Cursor and JetBrains. Model training is opt-out on every tier including Free.

The limit that matters is bandwidth, not capability. Pro and Max both carry a five-hour session limit plus a weekly cap, shared across Claude and Claude Code, so a long agentic build competes with your ordinary chat usage.

Verdict: pick Claude Code if you can already read the code it produces. Pick v0 if you cannot.

6. GitHub Copilot - Best for enterprise

GitHub Copilot is the safest enterprise choice because AI assistance lands inside tools your administrators already govern, but it complements v0 rather than replacing it.

It builds components and changes, not applications with a backend. If your goal is an application, you still need v0, Lovable or Bolt. If your goal is AI-assisted development inside a regulated estate, this is the tool.

The plan structure is now credit-based and worth reading carefully. GitHub’s Copilot plans page shows Free with limited chat and agent usage, 2,000 inline completions a month and 50 chat requests; Pro at $15 a month with $10 base credits plus a $5 flex allotment; Pro+ at $70 with $39 base plus $31 flex, adding delegation to third-party coding agents; and Max at $200 with $100 base plus $100 flex for sustained agent-driven work. One credit is $0.01. Code completions and next-edit suggestions do not consume credits and stay unlimited on paid plans.

Two governance facts will decide this for a lot of companies. GitHub states that Copilot Business and Enterprise data is never used to train its models, while Free, Pro and Pro+ interactions may be used from 24 April 2026 unless the subscriber opts out. And from 1 June 2026 code review workflows also consume GitHub Actions minutes, which is a budget conversation waiting to happen.

Verdict: adopt Copilot alongside v0 for code review and IDE work. Replace v0 with it only if your needs are component-level.

7. Cursor - Best code editor, with an ownership caveat

Cursor remains a capable AI-native editor with unusually good privacy defaults, but the corporate change makes it a harder sell for a team standard than it was a year ago.

What it does well is well documented. Cursor’s security documentation lists AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and a SOC 2 Type II attestation, and confirms that Privacy Mode, which disables training on your data, is available to anyone on free or paid tiers. Cloud agents, code hosting and AI code reviews arrive from Premium upward.

What changed is who owns it and which models you get. Cursor’s own pricing page now lists Free, Plus at $8, Premium at $30, Super at $100, Ultra at $200 and Teams from $30 per user, with the entry Plus tier explicitly offering only Grok models and third-party models billed separately at API list price above that. Behind that change, CNBC reported in August 2026 that SpaceX completed its $60 billion acquisition of Cursor on 14 August 2026, and that OpenAI is ending developers’ access to its models on Cursor with a proposed shutoff date of 12 November 2026. Cursor’s CEO said OpenAI models had been about 5 percent of Cursor traffic.

None of that makes Cursor bad. It makes it a different risk profile: single-owner, model supply shifting under you, and a pricing page that reads more like an xAI product than a developer tool.

Verdict: reasonable for individuals who want a strong editor. For a company, ask procurement about the SpaceX relationship and model supply before standardising on it.

8. Base44 - Best for non-technical teams

Base44 is the friendliest option for a team that wants a working internal tool with authentication and a database, without ever reviewing code, and it now sits inside Wix.

It is Wix-owned, which is visible in the copyright line on its site and is arguably the strongest stability story in this list. Every plan includes authentication, database functionality, analytics and a visual editor, which means the free tier is a real product rather than a sandbox.

Pricing is credit-based across five tiers. Base44’s pricing page shows Free at $0 with 25 message credits and 100 integration credits a month and up to 5 apps, then Starter at $16 a month billed annually with 100 message credits, Builder at $40 with 250, Pro at $80 with 500 and Elite at $160 with 1,200. Annual billing saves 20 percent. Two-way GitHub sync exports full source code at any time, which is genuinely better than nothing.

There is one genuine trap. v0’s own comparison notes that Base44’s two-way GitHub sync cannot be disconnected or transferred back once enabled. Think of it as a one-way door before you turn it on. Server-side rendering and server components also need an external frontend host.

Verdict: choose Base44 for operations and back-office tools where time-to-working beats code ownership. Avoid it if your team will want to leave.

9. Hostinger AI Builder - Best budget option

Hostinger AI Builder is the cheapest credible way to get a hosted site or small app running, and the price is only that cheap because you prepay for 48 months.

Two modes are offered. Manual mode is a conventional prompt-and-drag-and-drop builder. Agentic mode is the vibe-coding path, conversational, for websites and apps. Paid plans let you download your code, currently only from Agentic mode.

Hostinger’s AI Builder pricing page shows Premium at $2.99 a month on a 48-month term, renewing at $10.99, with up to 3 websites and a one-time gift of 5 AI credits. Unlimited is $3.99 on prepay renewing at $16.99, with unlimited sites and 15 AI credits. Cloud Startup is $7.99 renewing at $25.99. AI credits are consumed by chatting with the agent and usage varies with complexity, and additional credits can be bought after the initial purchase.

The caveats are real. There is no free plan, no standalone product purchase without hosting, no native mobile app output, and a renewal price roughly three to four times the promotional price. Hostinger also states that if you already have an active hosting plan, AI Builder is included at no extra cost, which may make the marginal price zero for existing customers.

Verdict: sensible for brochure sites, landing pages and very small internal tools. Not for anything you expect to scale, because of the prepay.

10. Onlook - Best open-source and self-hosted option

Onlook is the only fully open-source option here, and it takes a different approach: you edit your real code rather than accepting generated code.

Where v0 and Lovable generate an application you then iterate on, Onlook presents a visual editor mapped onto your own Next.js and Tailwind codebase. You click an element, change it, and the underlying code changes with it. The code is the source of truth throughout.

Onlook’s GitHub repository is Apache 2.0 licensed, which means you can self-host it without restriction, and its own README describes it as an open-source alternative to Bolt.new, Lovable, v0, Replit Agent and similar tools. It supports visual editing, a layer tree, a component panel, real-time previews, branching, brand assets and tokens, MCP servers, and collaboration with comments.

The hosted product is a different commercial entity: Onlook’s pricing page describes custom team pricing covering project templates, branching and version control, theming and branding, SSO with SAML or OAuth, audit logs and admin controls, and says self-hosting is free on GitHub while the hosted cloud version requires contacting their team. There is no published list price.

The honest limit is scope. Onlook works best on Next.js and Tailwind projects and is early-stage. If your stack is Python, Rails or Go, it will not help you.

Verdict: pick Onlook when source control, licensing and vendor independence matter more than turnkey polish.

Which v0 by Vercel alternative should you choose?

Match the tool to the constraint that is actually hurting you, not to a generic notion of best.

1. Team seat cost is the problem → Lovable. Unlimited members on every plan is the single biggest structural difference from v0.
2. You want to build for free, properly → Bolt.new. 300,000 tokens a day and 1 million a month, permanently.
3. You want a full IDE and cloud runtime → Replit Agent on Core at $20 a month.
4. Design fidelity is the bottleneck → Magic Patterns. Pair it with v0 rather than replacing it.
5. You write code and want an agent, not a canvas → Claude Code on Claude Pro or Max.
6. Compliance and procurement decide first → GitHub Copilot alongside v0, not instead of it.
7. You want an AI-native editor and accept owner risk → Cursor, after a procurement conversation.
8. Nobody on your team will ever read the code → Base44. Wix ownership is a genuine plus.
9. Cost is the only thing that matters → Hostinger AI Builder, accepting the 48-month prepay.
10. You want to own and self-host everything → Onlook under Apache 2.0.

When you should keep v0 by Vercel

Keep v0 if your production stack is already Next.js on Vercel, because the integration advantage is real and hard to replicate.

The case for staying is specific. v0 writes Next.js, React, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS and shadcn/ui, which means the output lands in a codebase your team already knows. Its GitHub workflow creates a working branch per chat, commits each change, opens a pull request against your base branch and merges on Publish, and it will never push directly to main. Previews run the real application in a Vercel Sandbox with server-side code, API routes and database connections working, so what you see is what deploys.

Scale is on your side too. Vercel said in February 2026, when it rebuilt v0 around production use, that more than four million people had used the tool since general availability in 2024. Data integrations are broad: v0 connects to Upstash, Neon, Supabase and Vercel Blob for application storage, Snowflake for data warehouse work, and since January 2026, Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL, Aurora DSQL and DynamoDB serverless have been available directly inside v0. AWS also credits new accounts created through Vercel with $100 for database use for up to six months.

Do not switch if all three of these are true: you deploy to Vercel most days, your usage is steady rather than spiky, and you have fewer than about five paid seats.

When switching makes sense

Certain specific problems have clear answers, and none of them are about output quality.

• Credits keep expiring before you use them. v0’s monthly credits roll over but expire after 65 days, and purchased credits need an active paid plan. Lovable’s rollover rules are published in more detail and its paid credits last twelve months.
• Your seat bill is bigger than your usage. Move to Lovable and pay for one workspace credit pool.
• You need a real free tier to learn on. Bolt.new, by a distance.
• You need the free tier to keep working. Replit’s Starter plan is permanent, but it is gated to Lite build. GitHub Copilot Free is permanent too, and covers CLI and agent mode.
• You cannot get training opt-out at your budget. v0 reserves it for Enterprise. Lovable gives it on Business and Enterprise. Cursor gives Privacy Mode on every tier including free.
• You cannot import your existing repository into the alternative. Check this before you commit. Lovable cannot do it. v0, Replit, Cursor and Onlook all can.
• You must self-host. Onlook under Apache 2.0.
• You need a design system honoured in the output. Magic Patterns.
• You want to leave Vercel hosting but keep the code. Every tool here produces portable code, with the Base44 Git-sync caveat noted above.

How to migrate without chaos

Migrate the repository first, the history second, and the hosting last. Doing it in that order means you can stop at any point.

1. Push everything out of v0 into Git. v0 works on your repository rather than a proprietary store, so the first step is usually already done. If your project is not connected, open Project settings, connect or create a private repository, and let v0 push the current code. Once GitHub holds the source, you have already won.
2. Freeze the v0 chat. Do not keep prompting while you test the new tool. Every extra message spends credits and creates a diff you will have to reconcile.
3. Clone locally and check what you actually have. Confirm the build runs, the environment variables are documented and the database migrations are in the repo rather than only in the dashboard. This step catches the majority of migration surprises and it costs an afternoon.
4. Move one feature, not the whole app. Pick the smallest user-visible flow and rebuild it in the new tool. For Lovable specifically, remember the one-way rule: you export from Lovable to GitHub but cannot import from GitHub into Lovable, so connect the existing repository rather than starting fresh.
5. Reconcile with a pull request, not by copying files. Both v0 and Lovable push branches and open pull requests, which is exactly the review you want. Read the diff before merging.
6. Move hosting last, and keep the old deployment live. Deploy the new version to preview, run through the real flows, then cut over. Keep the Vercel project intact for a week in case you need to roll back.
7. Audit data and secrets last. v0 stores environment variables in Vercel and integrations provision accounts through the Marketplace. Export anything you need before you decommission anything.
8. Reconcile your billing. v0 team plans need a Vercel Pro subscription on top, at an extra $20 per month per its own documentation. Cancel the v0 seat only after the new tool has run a full month without you.

Final recommendation

Lovable is the best v0 by Vercel alternative overall, Bolt.new has the best free plan, and Claude Code is the right pick for power users.

Lovable wins because it matches v0 on full-stack output and beats it on the commercial terms that actually hurt at team scale: unlimited workspace members, published credit expiry rules, SAML and SCIM on Enterprise, and training opt-out starting at Business rather than Enterprise. Its one real weakness is that it cannot import an existing repository, so check that before you commit.

Bolt.new wins on the free tier by a margin nobody else matches, and Pro at $25 removes the daily cap entirely. Claude Code wins for anyone who already reads code, because it works on your actual repository instead of generating a new one.

Keep v0 if you deploy to Vercel every day, your team is small, and your usage is steady. Its Next.js and shadcn/ui output quality, its branch-and-pull-request workflow and its one-click deployment are not matched by anything here. Switch if credits are expiring unused, if per-seat pricing is hurting, if you need a genuine free tier or an open-source one, or if your data privacy requirements have outgrown what v0’s mid-tier plans offer.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best v0 by Vercel alternative overall? Lovable. It produces comparable full-stack applications, syncs two ways with GitHub, and charges for a workspace credit pool rather than per seat, which is where v0’s team plans get expensive. The main limitation is that you cannot import an existing repository into Lovable, only export to one.

Is there a free alternative to v0 by Vercel? Bolt.new, with a permanent free plan of 300,000 tokens a day and 1 million a month. The main limitation is that free sites carry Bolt branding and stop serving traffic after a monthly hosting cap of 10 GB and 333,333 requests.

Is v0 by Vercel itself free? Yes, it has a permanent Free plan rather than a trial. It is capped at seven messages a day with a small credit allowance, and free users cannot buy additional credits without upgrading to a paid plan.

Why do people leave v0 for Lovable or Bolt.new? Cost predictability. v0 sells credits that expire after 65 days and charges per user on team plans. Lovable charges per workspace with unlimited members, and Bolt.new meters raw tokens with a far larger free allowance.

Which alternative is best for developers who already write code? Claude Code. It works directly on real repositories from the terminal or your IDE under the same Claude Pro or Max subscription, and it is the only option here that treats you as a developer rather than a prompt author.

What is the cheapest v0 alternative for a small business? Hostinger AI Builder, where AI building is bundled with hosting from $2.99 per month on a 48-month prepay. If you would rather not prepay, Base44’s free plan includes authentication, a database and analytics at no cost.

Can I move an existing app from v0 to another tool? Yes, because v0 works on your GitHub repository rather than storing code in a closed system. Connect the same repository to the new tool and the code moves with it. Going the other direction is harder: Lovable cannot import an existing repository at all, and Base44’s two-way Git sync cannot be undone once enabled.

Is there an open-source alternative to v0? Onlook. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, free to self-host, and edits your real Next.js and Tailwind code rather than generating a throwaway preview. Its hosted version uses custom pricing with no published list price.

Did Firebase Studio shut down? Google is winding it down. Its documentation confirms new workspace creation and user signup are no longer supported, though existing workspaces can still be worked in and deployed. Treat it as unsuitable for anything new rather than as a free alternative.

Should I stay on v0 if my whole team is on Vercel? Probably. v0 is hard to beat for React and Next.js output quality, its Git workflow creates branches and pull requests for you, and it deploys straight to Vercel with production-accurate previews. Switching costs you that integration, and the saving only matters if your credit spend is genuinely wasteful.